⚠️ Scam Report: Pekin Exam Answers (Telegram: @dsatleakspekin / @c198422c) – Fake SAT Leak Scam, Buyers Blocked Hours Before the Exam
SCAM
0
out of
5
👤 Scammer Information
- Channel Name: Pekin Exam Answers
- Channel Link: https://t.me/dsatleakspekin (3,574 subscribers in the screenshot, now over 8,900)
- Admin / Seller Username:
@c198422c(display name “Seller”) - Telegram Status: “Last seen a long time ago” (he has blocked his buyers)
- Payment Wallet (USDT on TON):
UQCgFU6TBNOxKCJIxHdnll4dKFP7huuE15St6C_1B-T-rxvY - Accepted Payments (per his own ads): Binance gift cards, USDT, Bitcoin, Ethereum
- Current Status: Still active. The channel is now advertising the October 3 SAT with the same “pay 50% now” offer.
📦 What Was Promised
The channel ran this ad before the September exam:
“September 12 SAT high result guaranteed. Share with others. Watermark technology, 5 AM GMT+8 delivery time. Pre-examination explanation to quickly improve performance. Pay 50%, and 50% before September 12. @dsatleakspekin By @c198422c”
-
Leaked Digital SAT questions and answers, plus “software”/access codes, delivered before the exam.
-
Trust was built with a 3k+ subscriber count, posted “1600” score reports and “leak” videos.
-
One buyer noticed that the “leak” video was someone else's recording with an
@dsatleakspekinwatermark pasted on top:“Bro couldn't even put a proper watermark”
-
Buyers explain why they paid:
“no but like I trusted him because he had 3k members” “How does he have so many members and proof??”
🧊 What Actually Happened
-
Upfront payment, then pressure for more. Victim A paid 200 USDT upfront. The Seller replied “Send exactly 300 USDT.” When asked to take the rest after the exam, he answered “Are you stupid?”
-
More money for a “new code”. Victim A asked “Send me new code”. The Seller replied “Send to it.” and pointed to the same wallet. Another 150 USDT was sent.
-
The excuse. Buyers were told he was “facing issues with the key or smth”.
-
The exit. A few hours before the exam, @c198422c:
- blocked every buyer, including on their second accounts (“blocked me in other id too”),
- deleted the private group,
- deleted all chat messages, leaving buyers with an empty chat and “last seen a long time ago”.
-
No codes, no software, no answers, no refunds. When buyers compared notes, none of them had received anything:
“Did you receive code?” – “nope” / “No, he blocked me” / “Ofcourse not fuck we got scammed”
-
Straight back to selling. On September 12 he posted “You know where you should purchase next time. @c198422c”, and the same day started advertising the October 3 SAT with the same 50% upfront deal.
“like atleast scam on the day off?? Give us time to find another seller or let us comprehend it??? But instead he scams a few hours before”
💰 Verified Transactions on the TON Blockchain
Victim A paid through Binance. Both Binance withdrawal receipts match transfers on the public TON blockchain, sent from the Binance Hot Wallet to the Seller's address.
| # | Binance receipt | On-chain amount | On-chain time (UTC) | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 200 USDT (0.3 fee), Aug 31, 2026 | 199.70 USD₮ | 2026-08-31 12:53 | d4a51370…05571d54 |
| 2 | 150 USDT (0.3 fee), Sep 9, 2026 | 149.70 USD₮ | 2026-09-09 17:10 | 98372aaa…344b3fb5 |
Receiving address: UQCgFU6TBNOxKCJIxHdnll4dKFP7huuE15St6C_1B-T-rxvY
What the wallet history shows:
- 38 incoming USDT transfers totalling 5,098.53 USD₮ between May 9 and September 13, 2026.
- Incoming amounts match what victims reported, e.g. 550 USD₮ on Aug 26, another 550 USD₮ on Aug 27, and 489.70 + 9.70 USD₮ on Aug 31.
- Every deposit was forwarded out within about 15 minutes, so the wallet never holds a balance.
- Payments kept arriving on September 10, 11 and 13, while buyers were already being blocked.
👥 Victims
After being blocked, buyers found each other and compared losses. Every conversation tells the same story: paid, received nothing, blocked, messages deleted.
| Victim | Amount lost | What they said | Screenshots |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victim A | $350 (200 + 150 USDT, verified on-chain) | Paid 200 upfront, pressured to pay more, blocked | Receipts above |
| Victim B | $500 | “alr we fucked” | #1 |
| Victim C | $550 | “He blocked me” / “Scammer” | #2, #3 |
| Victim D | $500 | “HE SCAM bro” / “he deleted all the message” / “pekin scammed me too. $500” | #4, #5, #6 |
| Victim E | $450 | “Ofcourse not fuck we got scammed” / “We all got scammed” | #7 |
| Victim F | $450 (≈ $500 with fees) | “I trusted him because he had 3k members” / “report his channel bro” | #8, #9 |
| Victim G | Not stated (paid for the software) | “Pekin js scammed me” / “He deleted everything” / “he blocked me. And even another customer” | #10, #11 |
Losses stated in these screenshots alone: at least $2,800. The scam wallet took in 5,098.53 USDT in total.
⚠️ How to Protect Yourself
- “Pay 50% now” is the setup. He takes the deposit, invents a reason to collect more, then disappears before the exam when nobody has time to react.
- Subscriber counts and “proof” are easy to fake. 3k or 9k members, score reports and watermarked videos prove nothing. Here the video was someone else's recording.
- A seller who deletes chats and uses a throwaway username (
@c198422c, display name “Seller”) is planning his exit. - If you have paid, report the channel @dsatleakspekin and the account @c198422c to Telegram, and file a scam report with Binance using the transaction ID.
✅ Conclusion
Pekin Exam Answers (@dsatleakspekin), run by @c198422c, is a scam. Buyers paid $350–$550 each in USDT for September 12, 2026 SAT “answers” and software codes. They received nothing and were blocked, and the group and chats were deleted hours before the exam. The payments are confirmed on the TON blockchain. The channel is still running and is now collecting deposits for the October 3 SAT.
🧾 Chat Screenshots
Channel & Admin
Payment Receipts
Victim Conversations
#1 – Victim B ($500)
#2, #3 – Victim C ($550)
#4, #5, #6 – Victim D ($500)
#7 – Victim E ($450)
#8, #9 – Victim F ($450)
#10, #11 – Victim G
